![]() Then you have both speed and robustness against manual errors as well as software/error problems with your PC.? tag revisions with suitable names when you hit milestones (cut a demo version for a customer, add a significant feature, leave for the day. commit back to server frequently (when you fix a bug, add a feature, or just regularly) keep a local SVN checkout as the working copy (on your fast SSD), keep master on the server, navigate the project + make changes + run compiles locally I realize this may be crossing the line and if so I apologize - just trying to be helpful! Seems a bit like you've got the worst of both worlds at the moment - slow browsing and compilation (due to remote file access over WiFi) but little real mitigation of the actual practical risks involved, because of your workflow. Isn't there a risk otherwise that you screw something up towards the end and end up unsure of exactly what you actually demo:ed and/or the state of the project when you last ran your full suite of tests? In SVN as you know every commit is a revision and you can of course tag revisions with whatever label you want according to whatever naming standard works for you, and it would seem sensible to at least commit - and if you need it to keep track of the revisions - also tag with labels ahead of demos etc. but sounds pretty risky, despite the sense of security that RAIDZ2 on the file system on the server may bring. that approach to source code management / versioning is a bit unusual, and I'm not going to judge. Unfortunately, it is not an option for me to separate and put each WiFi and FreeNAS on different networks.Ĭlick to expand.Ok sounds like short-term you should focus on your network/wifi problems and with some suggestions further above. I would like to understand if having a new WiFi Router with Gigabit port and 750Mbit/sec or higher advertised Wifi capabilities will actually increase above speeds. My test on my WiFi is slower but not with a big margin: I found a thread with iperf test and I tried to use it with same parameters for testing my cable network speed using my laptop when there is nobody accessing FreeNAS and results are as following:Ĭ:\iperf-2.0.9-win64>iperf.exe -c 192.168.1.2 -p 5001 -f m -w 128k -P 2Ĭlient connecting to 192.168.1.2, TCP port 5001 My projects they are around 74MB in single EXE size. I am using Delphi for my software development needs and my bottleneck is compiling them as Delphi generating big EXE files. My main usage is application development. ![]() ![]() I am using that system alone during day-time. I personally am using heavily my desktop on same WiFi. My house is an old one and there is no network cable infrastructure. I have to physically put the box in a separate room in my home in order to have cable access to my TP-Link WR840N router. No jail, no VM, just windows file sharing on RaidZ2 with LZ4 compression on.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |